tell someone that Handmaid’s Tale is actually not the most controversial of the Canadian novels, and they will probably argue with you.Give the gift of his 1976 piece by Marian Engel bearIn this piece, enemies would be silenced when the lead female character, in a sarcastic, non-satirical way, begins a sexual relationship with a bear as part of her spiritual journey.not even that beauty and the beast situation. There are no handsome human princes hiding under furs, and no magic spells that can be broken with true love. Not a fairy tale. It’s not magic realism either. The protagonist’s main love interest is literally a bear.
Set in the beautiful forested Algoma in northeastern Ontario, Canada, the novel depicts the protagonist named Lou, a restless archivist dissatisfied with life in Toronto. She seeks escape and fulfillment, and then she accepts a job offer to reorganize the library on remote Carey Island. It starts off with a fairly ordinary premise, but the plot takes an unexpected turn when Lou, hoping for a meaningful companionship, decides to form her bond with a bear that roams the area. Her bond with the bear went a little too far to reassure some readers, and many raised eyebrows when the book was published. Canadian Encyclopedia considers the book, almost honorific, “the most controversial novel ever written in Canada”.
But some critics argue that Engel was writing more than pornography. Literary scholar Tania Aguila-Way believes that this bestiality serves effectively as a metaphorical commentary on Canada’s unfortunate history of over-exploitation of being close to nature, and the environmental theme of Margaret Atwood. It notes similarities to the 1972 novel. surface finish. According to Aguillaway,
bear It likewise dramatically depicts the dangers of confusing human-animal solidarity with human-animal identity, underscoring the political and ethical implications of this instrumentalized logic. The protagonist’s identification with the novel’s title character is often flanked by indigenization dynamics that mirror the novel’s disturbing episodes. History of Canadian settlers and invaders.
Catriona Sandilands argues that the human-bear power relationship is essential to guiding both the hero’s and the reader’s psychological voyage, and Lou argues that
You cannot capture a bear in your mind-life, nor can you surrender your abstract humanity to a bear body and become a bear. The bear here is the Other. You can’t colonize him or make him human any more than you can “wild” Lu and try to become a bear.
Today, perhaps because internet culture has made it less shocking to modern audiences, bear It has become something of a joke in the literary world. In 2014, the book’s erotic cover became a memetic mutation (meme) on the internet.Perhaps the most surprising bear The 2017 Oscar-winning director of Guillermo del Toro. shape of waterThe book, which features a romance between a man and a fish, has yet to be made into a movie.
Support JSTOR every day! Join Patreon’s new membership program today.
JSTOR is a digital library for scholars, researchers and students. JSTOR Daily readers have free access to the original research behind the articles on JSTOR.
Posted by: Tania Aguila Way
Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment, Vol. 23, No. 1 (Winter 2016), pp. 5-29
Oxford University Press
Posted By: Catriona Sandilands
Frontiers: Journal of Women’s Studies, Vol. 18, No. 2, Intersection of Feminism and Environmentalism (1997), pp. 135–156
University of Nebraska Press